翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

effective number of parties : ウィキペディア英語版
effective number of parties
The effective number of parties is a concept which provides for an adjusted number of political parties in a country's party system. The idea behind this measure is to count parties and, at the same time, to weight the count by their relative strength. The relative strength refers to their vote share ("effective number of electoral parties") or seat share in the parliament ("effective number of parliamentary parties"). This measure is especially useful when comparing electoral systems across countries, as is done in the field of political science.〔Lijphart, Arend (1999): Patterns of Democracy. New Haven/London: Yale UP〕 The number of parties equals the effective number of parties only when all parties have equal strength. In any other case, the effective number of parties is lower than the actual number of parties. The effective number of parties is a frequent operationalization for the fragmentation of a party system.
There are two major alternatives to the effective number of parties-measure. John K. Wildgen's index of "hyperfractionalization" accords special weight to small parties. Juan Molinar's index gives special weight to the largest party.〔http://www.jstor.org/pss/1963951〕 Dunleavy and Boucek provide a useful critique of the Molinar index.〔P. Dunleavy and F. Boucek (2003): 'Constructing the Number of Parties.' Party Politics 9(3): 291-315.〕
==Formulae==
According to Laakso and Taagepera (1979)〔Laakso, M.; R. Taagepera (1979): Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. ''Comparative Political Studies'' 12:3-27.〕 the ''effective number of parties'' is computed by the following formula:
^n p_i^2}
|}
Where n is the number of parties with at least one vote/seat and p_i^2 the square of each party’s proportion of all votes or seats. The proportions need to be ''normalised'' such that, for example, 50 per cent is 0.5 and 1 per cent is 0.01. This is also the formula for the inverse Simpson index, or the true diversity of order 2.
An alternative formula proposed by Golosov (2010)〔Golosov, Grigorii V. (2010): The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach. ''Party Politics'' 16:171-192.〕 is

|}
which is equivalent - if we only consider parties with at least one vote/seat - to

|}
Here, n is the number of parties, p_i^2 the square of each party’s proportion of all votes or seats, and p_1^2 is the square of the largest party’s proportion of all votes or seats.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「effective number of parties」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.